researcher
The scholar is a study of some kind of study and a person specialized in the professor and the general term of the occupation.
I say a researcher (a Ken stable), the student (a study).
An expert of the study.
With the scholar, the researcher who has an occupation unless I am called a scholar of amateur, the research worker of the university - the student of the Ph.D. program is included in a wide sense from the researcher of the teacher of the university, a research organization and the research institute, an occupation researcher such as the curator of the museum (here, I describe an occupation researcher).
I look worldwide, and, in the case of the physical science, a doctor tends to be a necessary condition (by the Anglo-Saxon culture, I consider it to be only a study assistant in the researcher with Osamu soldier).
The scholar announces the result of research activities regularly in a society.
The status of the scholar has the exception, too, but it is not exaggeration even if it says that it looks worldwide and is fixed with quality and the number of the article (full paper with review written in English in particular depending on a field).
It depends on the university to acquire the doctor who is one title as the scholar, but I usually need articles with three review more than it, and it is it with the element that the number of the articles is important in the search for the later post.
Because it is this evaluation method, it may be said that I am equal depending on a certain meaning, ability for study (the number of the articles), but the survival is very difficult.
This system was disadvantageous to the person who chose the theme that it was hard to write of the article, and, besides, other aspects (character, contribution to society and education contribution) were hard to stop in an object of the evaluation, and this evil continued being pointed out for many years.
In addition, the vertical connection of the scholar is strong, but the tradition of the field inimitableness is different again without there are few horizontal connections, and there being the someone familiar if different in a field.
In addition, there is not it by exaggeration even if each scholar says a real amateur about the field out of one's specialty.
There is indication that it is village shrine society of the spider hole than this.
I say a researcher (a Ken stable), the student (a study).
An expert of the study.
With the scholar, the researcher who has an occupation unless I am called a scholar of amateur, the research worker of the university - the student of the Ph.D. program is included in a wide sense from the researcher of the teacher of the university, a research organization and the research institute, an occupation researcher such as the curator of the museum (here, I describe an occupation researcher).
I look worldwide, and, in the case of the physical science, a doctor tends to be a necessary condition (by the Anglo-Saxon culture, I consider it to be only a study assistant in the researcher with Osamu soldier).
The scholar announces the result of research activities regularly in a society.
The status of the scholar has the exception, too, but it is not exaggeration even if it says that it looks worldwide and is fixed with quality and the number of the article (full paper with review written in English in particular depending on a field).
It depends on the university to acquire the doctor who is one title as the scholar, but I usually need articles with three review more than it, and it is it with the element that the number of the articles is important in the search for the later post.
Because it is this evaluation method, it may be said that I am equal depending on a certain meaning, ability for study (the number of the articles), but the survival is very difficult.
This system was disadvantageous to the person who chose the theme that it was hard to write of the article, and, besides, other aspects (character, contribution to society and education contribution) were hard to stop in an object of the evaluation, and this evil continued being pointed out for many years.
In addition, the vertical connection of the scholar is strong, but the tradition of the field inimitableness is different again without there are few horizontal connections, and there being the someone familiar if different in a field.
In addition, there is not it by exaggeration even if each scholar says a real amateur about the field out of one's specialty.
There is indication that it is village shrine society of the spider hole than this.